Cykel Carbon Vs Aluminum

The quality of the frame will ultimately determine weight.

Cykel carbon vs aluminum. En carbon eller aluminiumscykel. Carbon fiber composite has a density almost x 2 times less than aluminium and more than 5 times less than steel. There are two major factors that we see as a benefit of a carbon frame over an aluminum one. Cyklens materiale er en af de vigtigste ting du skal tage stilling til inden du køber en cykel.

It s a relatively light and stiff material and generally cheaper to produce than carbon. Carbon fiber doesn t exhibit this type of crack propagation. It was true 20 years ago when aluminum frames were unrefined and still being built using traditional designs. Carbon fiber composites have a density of 1 55 g cm 3 epoxy resin 30 carbon fiber 70 that in the case of aluminum is 2 7g cm 3 and 4 5 g cm 3 for titanium or 7 9 g cm 3 for steel.

A well built lightweight aluminum frame could weigh less than an inexpensive carbon frame. A carbon bike is generally lighter than an aluminum equivalent. Aluminum is a stiffer material and as such transfers much more of the trail including rocks and roots into your hands and behind. A carbon frame has a damping effect which lowers the harshness in the ride.

No as aluminum has a grain structure that can propagate cracks if surface damage occurs. However you should mark the word equivalent. Aluminium was the leader when it came to frame material before carbon become more accessible. Der findes to overordnede typer.

Men mange er ikke bevidste om hvor betydningsfuldt materialevalget rent faktisk er og hvad der er forskellen. Both carbon and aluminum come in different grades. For our money the feel of carbon is superior to aluminum and may in fact be worth the upgrade cost in itself. Ride quality is more noticeable on road frames than mountain frames with vibrations being damped by carbon more so than aluminum.

The primary difference between carbon and aluminum comes down to weight and ride quality. Dampening and torsional stiffness. Carbon frames are usually a bit lighter than aluminum up to a pound for mountain frames and up to a half pound on road frames. The conventional wisdom in cycling has been that aluminum is stiff and harsh while carbon is compliant and smooth.

Yes as carbon is obviously a softer material than aluminum so damage can occur due to direct contact with rocks or the ground more easily. A lower grade carbon for instance comes with plenty of fillers. Cykel i carbon eller aluminium same same but very different. The carbon fiber variant is around 320 whereas the aluminum variant is around 145 at the time of writing depending on the retailer that you purchase them from.

In order to create lightweight frames tube thickness is varied throughout the length of the tube.